Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Nastiest US Presidential Election in decades busts wide open

. . . as the notorious National Enquirer tries to repeat its Gary Hart knockout bombshell in 1984 and its more recent knockout of John Edwards:

Unfortunately, given the blatant agendas and cultural marxist alliances that are now obvious in the major international media . . . and only somewhat less so in our regional media, we are looking at the new normal for media. 

A new normal that echoes the worst days of yellow journalism

Where, a key step to understanding our times is to realise that the same forces, agendas and messages that have come out as dominant through the current US election are in the main violently anti-Christian, and will be turning their media spin big guns on us next as they seek to de-Christianise our civilisation.

So, we need to hold our noses and look closer, so we can begin to understand the forces, trends, strategies and factors at work in this media exchange. Which -- echoing the "October Surprise" hits at Trump in the days leading up to the first two debates -- is occurring in the 24-hour news cycle leading up to the final of the three scheduled debates between Mr Trump and Mrs Clinton.

 So, let us look at a snippet, reportedly from a  nine-page article full of specifics, documents and more:
“I arranged a meeting for Hillary and a woman in an exclusive Beverly Hills hotel,” the man, who was hired by the Clintons, via a Hollywood executive, to cover up their scandals, told The ENQUIRER.
“She had come to the studio to see the filming of a movie in 1994.”
“While I was there, I helped her slip out of a back exit for a one-on-one session with the other woman. It was made to look casual, leaving quietly [rather] that being caught up in the melee … but really it was for something presumably more sordid.”
What’s more, it wasn’t just Hillary’s flings with women that the shadowy Mr. Fix It helped to orchestrate!
Hillary’s former bagman finally confessed to The ENQUIRER just how he helped her to cover up her affair with married lover Vince Foster, too!
-- How should we view this, given the steady bombardment of accusations that followed the recent locker-room, potty mouth boasting tape of Trump, from 2005?

-- Is this, turnabout is fair, given the mud-slinging already on the table?

-- Should we dismiss this as simply uncorroborated accusations?

-- Is the lesbian angle even a scandal anymore (given the promotion of homosexuality as a perceived "normal" behaviour)?
At one level, this counter-offensive clearly illustrates how two can play at mud-slinging tactics, and is likely a warning-shot that much worse can be opened up if the Clinton campaign does not back off. Especially, if there is a further doubling down on slinging sex abuse accusations at Trump.

So, it is in effect a "fight fire with fire" counter-move to block a piling on of accusations.

At the second level, it opens up/gives legs to seven key issues that would likely give many would-be voters in the mushy middle (where elections are decided) significant pause . . . and I reluctantly list these claims because of their importance in the climate of discussion, not as an endorsement of either truthfulness or of tactics: 

1: whether or not Mrs Clinton is a practising Lesbian (and, e.g. Ms Gennifer Flowers long since cited her husband to that effect, which fits the context that such a view has been a commonplace in the Clinton home state, Arkansas), she and her party have been key backers of the homosexualist agenda and would be likely to entrench it through US Supreme Court appointments should she be elected. (As a consequence this and several other radical agendas would move forward at warp speed, potentially triggering civil disturbances in the US on a scale that echoes the 1850's - 60's, not even the 1960's.)

2: One of those fingered as suspiciously close to Mrs Clinton is Ms Huma Abedin, who is an obvious Islam-IST agent of influence, given her radical connexions to the Muslim Brotherhood via front groups and also through her family, e.g. she was on the editorial board of The Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs (founded by her mother) for a decade.

3: It is rumoured that Chelsea is actually the daughter of Webster Hubble, to the point that comparative pictures are common, with a focus on lips and nose.

4: It is rumoured that Vince Foster (a former colleague at the Rose Law Firm and a senior White House officer in the early days of the 1990's Clinton Presidency) was her lover and that his apparent suicide was in that connexion. (Which in turn brings up other cases, scandals and concerns going back to the Whitewater, Travelgate, 900 FBI files on opponents and Commodity Trading cases.)

5: There has been a claim that her husband has an unacknowledged black son.

6: It is credible that Mrs Clinton has been closely involved with intimidating and discrediting women sexually abused by her husband.

7: It is on tape -- tape that major media do not play, even as they have endlessly played the 2005 potty mouth tapes of Mr Trump -- that when Mrs Clinton recounted how she successfully defended an accused rapist of a twelve-year old girl, she noted that he passed a polygraph test, which led her to disbelieve such machines. And then, she laughed. This, in a context that the defence was based on the notorious former rape defence tactic of discrediting the girl.

This cluster is sobering and yet it has been overshadowed in the context of the massive media bombardment of Trump. 

If the media only now picks this up, it drastically shifts the climate -- and raises the question of why these things have been suppressed for so long. 

If it studiously avoids, it proves its loss of credibility; which discredits its message dominance.

Perhaps more likely is the selection of snippets that they can make seem ill-founded, then try to brush aside the whole as discredited . . . relying on mass media reach dominance. (The problem, here, is that National Enquirer has a huge circulation, and will be there, sitting in essentially every supermarket check-out line as an impulse item. In the 24-hour media cycle surrounding the third and final Presidential debate. And, it has a decades-long track record of bringing down Presidential candidates through breaking scandals suppressed by the main stream media houses.)

Whichever way this goes, this blows open the media side of the election.

Then that opens up a wide range of further policy linked issues that have been overshadowed across the election cycle, raising further questions as to why that has been happening. 

For instance, we face a dangerous and unstable global geostrategic situation:


And, it opens up some serious inroads on why so many do not trust Mrs Clinton.

All of this has some significance in its own right, sordid though it is. It underscores just how broken and bankrupt the leadership culture of our civilisation is. And, it shows us the sort of tactics and techniques that are likely to be turned on Christians more and more in coming months and years. Especially if the generally available polls, betting markets and many pundits are right, and the American public will vote in Mrs Clinton as the next President of the USA.

We have to prepare for a ruthless, vicious, devastating media onslaught, the likes of which we have never seen before. An assault that will be led by an orchestrated wave of scandals with piling on accusers as we have seen in recent weeks. Backed up by wall to wall coverage across a range of major networks. Then, deeper issues of the radical challenges to the credibility of the gospel, scriptures and general foundations of the Christian faith will be on the table. Echoing Dawkins and others (and drawing on typical cultural marxist themes about oppression by the culture of Christendom and the need to liberate fringe minorities), how dare you resort to myths about a misogynistic, genocidal, anti-gay/lesbian bronze age sky god to oppress people needing liberation in today's modern age

How will we handle that?

While scandal after scandal, accuser after accuser is being trotted out and given wall-to-wall media coverage by a shark-pack of activist journalists and editors 
(many of whom are driven by homosexualist rage at traditional morality and are energised by their recent cultural war triumph of establishing so-called same sex marriage as "mainstream" in law and public opinion . . . ) 

. . . who smell blood in the water, Christian blood in the water?

The "final" assault on the vestiges of Christendom in our civilisation is doubtless being prepared as we speak, and it its going to be nasty, demonically intense beyond belief and sustained for months to years. 

Where, it is obvious, that we are woefully under-prepared for what is predictably coming. 

Samson, the Philistines are upon you! 

And that should give us serious, sobering pause. END