Monday, October 05, 2020

Part 6: Are there 6 + 1 ABC first principles in Heb 6:1 - 2? (That is, is going on to perfection . . . on pain of fatal apostasy . . . the implied seventh principle? And, what is that perfection?)

 There is no doubt that Heb 6:1 - 2 is oddly phrased to our modern ears, and that it sits in one of the most controversial texts in the NT; appearing to endorse a strong view of backsliding/apostasy that suggests loss of salvation. At the same time, it is clear that the six principles are deeply embedded in the chief examples of gospel preaching in the Acts, especially in Ch 2, Ch 10 and ch 17. 

So, as we continue to look at theological systematisation and our understanding of "the faith, once for all delivered to the saints," this topic unavoidably comes up.

Let's refocus the text:

Heb 6: 1 Therefore let us leave the elementary doctrine of Christ and go on to maturity [or, perfection], not laying again a foundation of repentance from dead works and of faith toward God, 2 and of instruction about [baptisms],  the laying on of hands, the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment. 3 And this we will do if God permits.

Does this mean, we abandon the "foundation" six listed principles in going on towards the goals of perfected maturity? 

Let's ponder the foundation metaphor, as it is instructive:


Having gone to the effort and expense of laying down a foundation, do we then abandon it, walking away and doing something elsewhere, unrelated? Clearly not, the foundation supports and sustains the stability and soundness of a building, as Jesus famously noted in the closing metaphor in his Sermon on the Mount:

Matt 7: 21  “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22  On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ 23  And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’

Build Your House on the Rock 

 24  “Everyone then who hears these words of mine and does them will be like a wise man who built his house on the rock. 25 And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house, but it did not fall, because it had been founded on the rock. 26 And everyone who hears these words of mine and does not do them will be like a foolish man who built his house on the sand. 27 And the rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell, and great was the fall of it.”

The Authority of Jesus 

 28 And when Jesus finished these sayings, the crowds were astonished at his teaching, 29 for he was teaching them as one who had authority, and not as their scribes.

Where, a key tie-in is in Matt 3, with the teaching of John:

Matt 3: 1 In those days John the Baptist came preaching in the wilderness of Judea, 2 “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.” 3 For this is he who was spoken of by the prophet Isaiah when he said,

 “The voice of one crying in the wilderness:
 ‘Prepare1  the way of the Lord;
make his paths straight.’” 

 4 Now John wore a garment of camel's hair and a leather belt around his waist, and his food was locusts and wild honey. 5 Then Jerusalem and all Judea and all the region about the Jordan were going out to him, 6 and they were baptized by him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins. 

 7 But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said to them, 

“You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? 8 Bear fruit in keeping with repentance. 9 And do not presume to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father,’ for I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children for Abraham. 10 Even now the axe is laid to the root of the trees. Every tree therefore that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.

 11 “I baptize you with water for repentance, but he who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. 12 His winnowing fork is in his hand, and he will clear his threshing floor and gather his wheat into the barn, but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire.”

Notice, his call to repentance (thus to genuine faith, the other side of the coin), his practice of baptism, turning the proselyte baptism rooted in the story of Naaman into a sword pointed at the uncircumcised hearts of the native Jews he here calls a brood of snakes, his pointing to coming wrath to be fled (thus, implying resurrection and judgement). He goes on to -- under protest that the baptism should be the other way around -- baptise Jesus, only to see the Heavenly Dove Descending with the Voice of approval, this is my beloved Son with whom I am well pleased, hear ye him. 

So immediately, the microcosm-holographic principle is already at work:

Microcosm/Holographic principle (for Bible & Theology): "Macrocosm and microcosm refers to a vision of cosmos where the part (microcosm) reflects the whole (macrocosm) and vice versa." The hologram is such that a small part has in it the whole image though in less defined detail:

M/H 1] In theological systematics there is a concept that God's attributes are mutually present and point to or imply one another, they do not merely happen to fit together somehow. Similarly,  

M/H 2] in Bible study/exegesis/ Biblical theology the whole counsel of God lurks in any given text, and each such text contributes to the seamlessly woven whole. Further to this,

M/H 3] each aspect influences all and all influence each. It is in that context that

M/H 4] the whole counsel of God on a given matter is a powerful synthesis in which parts and wholes intersect and interact.
That is how scripture interprets scripture, it is why it took generations for the greats to develop a sound, aptly phrased systematic framework and it is why this must ever be in balance with the particular texts and the flow of biblical history.

As a consequence in theology, the genuinely great are in fact highly authoritative as teachers, they simply know much in a complex, sound synthesis, which in turn is built on the apostles and prophets with Christ the cornerstone. Unfortunately, we must be warned against instability and ignorance wrenching text and sense to their own ruin and that of those who are misled by such. And yes, all of this is hard to follow or accept in this current day. Nevertheless, the complex systematic deep knowledge and experience of genuine experts counts, counts deeply beyond what they can articulate.

Likewise, the premise of repentance is transformational change of mindset and so of life involving inextricably entangled gospel ethics, which is reflected in the enacted metaphor of baptism in water and in the cloud:

1 Cor 10: 1 For I do not want you to be unaware, brothers,1  that 

-- our fathers were all under the cloud, and all passed through the sea, 2 and 

-- all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea, 3 and 

-- all ate the same spiritual food, 4 and all drank the same spiritual drink [--> parallel to the Communion meal]. For 

-- they drank from the spiritual Rock that followed them, and the Rock was Christ. [--> Christ implicitly present in the OT]

5 Nevertheless, with most of them God was not pleased, for they were overthrown2  in the wilderness. 

 6 Now these things took place as examples for us, that we might not desire evil as they did. 7 Do not be idolaters as some of them were; as it is written, “The people sat down to eat and drink and rose up to play.” 

8 We must not indulge in sexual immorality as some of them did, and twenty-three thousand fell in a single day. 

9 We must not put Christ3  to the test, as some of them did and were destroyed by serpents, 10 nor grumble, as some of them did and were destroyed by the Destroyer. 

11 Now these things happened to them as an example, but they were written down for our instruction, on whom the end of the ages has come. 

12 Therefore let anyone who thinks that he stands take heed lest he fall. 

13 No temptation has overtaken you that is not common to man. God is faithful, and he will not let you be tempted beyond your ability, but with the temptation he will also provide the way of escape, that you may be able to endure it.

So, now, let us re-examine a now familiar infographic:


We here see Daniel's recounting of Nebuchadnezzar's dream and his prophecy of Messiah and Kingdom of God/Heaven . . . a key feature of the Gospels and Acts. Immediately, messiahship, gospel, mission to the nations, culmination are all eschatological, are all bound up in fulfillment of OT prophecy. No wonder the opening bat, captain's knock sermon by Peter on that first Pentecost Sunday recorded in Ac 2 was cast in light of such fulfillment in these last days, no wonder 1 Cor 15:1 - 11 is about "according to scripture." And we have already seen the triune God and the pivotal role of the incarnate Son as Messiah at Jesus' baptism.  All of which are prefigured in John the Baptist's preaching and by obvious extension the understanding of even the leaders of Israel who came to him to be baptised, only to be sternly warned.

So, we can lay to rest one side-track already. 

Of course the six principles of discipleship foundation are profoundly hebraic and would invite addressing ceremonial washings, the story of Naaman, Jewish proselyte baptism, John and Jesus, Moses, cloud and sea. But now transformed by eschatological fulfillment, Messiah has come, he is the unifying cornerstone. And the apostolic deposit carries forward the message to the world, complete with its integral ethics that bring forth the fruit of repentance, calling the comfortable to flee the coming wrath.

The six principles are indeed the word of the beginning of Christ.

So, we should study them, recognising how naturally an integrated framework emerges, one that unsurprisingly looks a lot like the themes, biblical references and structure in the Nicene Creed. Also, with a profound respect for the foundational nature and authority of the scriptures where we find the holy teachings.

But what of perfection/apostasy?

Obviously, John took a pretty grim view of the leaders of religion in his day: brood of poisonous, treacherous snakes, who has told you to flee the coming wrath? 

Similarly, we cannot escape the force of Paul's warning to the church, based on the mixed many who passed through the Red Sea and were under the cloud. He plainly spoke of outbreaks of apostasy and gross immorality. He warns, and such are pretty directly echoed in Hebrews 6.

 The minimum we can see is that tardiness in spiritual growth is of the same essence of and carries already the taint of gross immorality and apostasy. It can be taken as an early fever warning of a spiritual complaint that could ruinously spin out of control. So, instead, we must seek to grow in God's grace, truth, love, purity, power. We must be careful to see to fruit meet unto repentance. 

These, are general. 

To become specific, let us turn to what is credibly a preserved circular letter to the churches (and which gives us a window into the much broader context of what was said by the living C1 apostles to those they taught and trained):

Eph 2:4 But  God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which he loved us, 5 even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ— by grace you have been saved— 6 and raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, 7 so that in the coming ages he might show the immeasurable riches of his grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. [--> eternal purpose]

 8 For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, 9 not a result of works, so that no one may boast. [--> salvation by works schemes are fatally flawed. Good works are the FRUIT of repentance, not the substance]

10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them. [--> so, there is a path laid out for us to follow]

Already, we are saved by God's grace not by works but to do good works laid out in advance. These are all implicit in the six principles, which pivot on Christ the chief cornerstone and fuse the hebraic prophets and inheritance with Messiah and gospel as eschatological fulfillment looking to culmination. Where, too, this text must forever remind us of how confused foundational things were 500 years ago, such that we saw a major contention and split over justification by faith and linked issues. Yes, we can fail to soundly lay a foundation for discipleship.

And so we come to the operational form of the gospel-witnessing church's mandate, a literally cosmological view:

Eph 4: 9 ( In saying, “He ascended,” what does it mean but that he had also descended into the lower regions, the earth?2  10 He who descended is the one who also ascended far above all the heavens, that he might fill all things.) 

11 And he gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the shepherds3  and teachers,4  12 to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ, 13 until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood,5  to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ, 14 so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro by the waves and carried about by every wind of doctrine, by human cunning, by craftiness in deceitful schemes. 

15 Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ, 16 from whom the whole body, joined and held together by every joint with which it is equipped, when each part is working properly, makes the body grow so that it builds itself up in love.

 17 Now this I say and testify in the Lord, that you must no longer walk as the Gentiles do, in the futility of their minds. 18 They are darkened in their understanding, alienated from the life of God because of the ignorance that is in them, due to their hardness of heart. 19 They have become callous and have given themselves up to sensuality, greedy to practice every kind of impurity. 

20 But that is not the way you learned Christ!— 21 assuming that you have heard about him and were taught in him, as the truth is in Jesus, 22 to put off your old self,6  which belongs to your former manner of life and is corrupt through deceitful desires, 23 and to be renewed in the spirit of your minds, 24 and to put on the new self, created after the likeness of God in true righteousness and holiness. 

Already, we see the framework, one that gives focus to what perfection is: "the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ" pervading and transforming all things, and also highlights the integrated complementarity by which each of us contributes to and is nurtured by the whole. 

Where, of course, that fulness principle is systematic and integrative, articulating the core gospel regarding the faith once for all delivered to the saints to quite literally everything.

Let us note a sample of how the apostle draws in the span of practical life through these principles, hinting of a fortiori reasoning, and the like, such are yardstick examples not an exclusive, exhaustive list:

4: 25 Therefore, having put away falsehood, let each one of you speak the truth with his neighbor, for we are members one of another. 

26 Be angry and do not sin; do not let the sun go down on your anger, 27 and give no opportunity to the devil. 

28 Let the thief no longer steal, but rather let him labor, doing honest work with his own hands, so that he may have something to share with anyone in need. 

29 Let no corrupting talk come out of your mouths, but only such as is good for building up, as fits the occasion, that it may give grace to those who hear. 

30 And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption. 

31 Let all bitterness and wrath and anger and clamor and slander be put away from you, along with all malice. 

32 Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.

5: 1 Therefore be imitators of God, as beloved children. 2 And walk in love, as Christ loved us and gave himself up for us, a fragrant offering and sacrifice to God. 

 3 But sexual immorality and all impurity or covetousness must not even be named among you, as is proper among saints.

 4 Let there be no filthiness nor foolish talk nor crude joking, which are out of place, but instead let there be thanksgiving. 5 For you may be sure of this, that everyone who is sexually immoral or impure, or who is covetous ( that is, an idolater), has no inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God. 

6 Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience. 

7 Therefore do not become partners with them; 8 for at one time you were darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. 

Walk as children of light 9 (for the fruit of light is found in all that is good and right and true), 10 and try to discern what is pleasing to the Lord. 11 Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them. 12 For it is shameful even to speak of the things that they do in secret. 13 But when anything is exposed by the light, it becomes visible, 14 for anything that becomes visible is light. 

Therefore it says,
 “Awake, O sleeper,
and arise from the dead,
and Christ will shine on you.” 

 15 Look carefully then how you walk, not as unwise but as wise, 16 making the best use of the time, because the days are evil. 

17 Therefore do not be foolish, but understand what the will of the Lord is. 

18 And do not get drunk with wine, for that is debauchery, but be filled with the Spirit, 19 addressing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody to the Lord with your heart, 20 giving thanks always and for everything to God the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, 21 submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ.

So, the perfection and warning about apostasy are already implicit in just the first of the six principles, repentance. However, for reasons of clarity, it may be helpful to draw them out. Where, obviously, going on implies that the foundation was soundly laid, now build on it. 

But, last but not least, John's rebuke to the leadership in Israel -- brood of vipers -- raises the case of unsound or incomplete foundations needing to be properly laid. 

Including, obviously, in our day.  END

PS: Ben Witherington, here, has further food for thought. Coffman here, too and the Pulpit Bible Commentary here.

Friday, September 18, 2020

Part 5: Systematising the Philemon model for responses to social evils (here, slavery)

 One of the central claims of Critical Race Theory (a marxist-derived attack on our civilisation intended to lead to cultural revolution) is that Western Culture including modern Constitutional Democracy embeds white supremacy and so is utterly illegitimate. Similarly, in attacking a celebration of the 400th anniversary of the epochal King James Translation, the US-based American Atheists pressure group tried to implicate the Christian Faith and its Scriptures. This led me to respond with an infographic:


Already, we see that gospel ethics, discipleship, counter-culture, 4R's reformation and apologetics issues are bound up in this matter. Where, manifestly, the Eph 4:9 - 24 framework implies that answers to great evils are going to be involved in the real-world application of the gospel agenda. Already, the infographic gives the kernel of an answer, there is no basis for assumed racial superiority/inferiority, and the gospel with its integral ethics comes to everyone equally. However, it does not motivate suicidal uprising, instead the gospel leads to reformation of evils. Indeed, we see how Paul directly counsels slaves not to let enslavement so eat up their lives; even as he counsels that if one can get out do so. (In the Roman Empire, apparently many slaves did get out of their misfortune.) 

  He also says we  were bought with the blood of Christ so we should not allow ourselves to be enslaved. Thus, gospel ethics and theology are clearly opposed to slavery. However they do not counsel suicidal rebellion, instead pointing to reformation.

So, we may turn to Philemon, Manumission letter for Onesimus an escaped slave of Philemon (who seems to have taken a significant sum of money in his escape attempt) who had found his way to Paul in Rome. This created the deadly challenge the infographic notes, as Paul was already suspect/accused on a capital charge and harbouring escaped slaves while being literally chained to guards was not advisable. It was in fact also a capital charge issue.

Let us note how Paul threaded his way through the eye of this needle, recognising how this ties into core themes of the faith once for all delivered to the saints:

Philemon 1

 1 Paul, a prisoner for Christ Jesus, and Timothy our brother [--> a pivotal theme],


To Philemon our beloved fellow worker 2 and Apphia our sister 

[--> included in brotherhood, with implications for female slaves and the peculiar horrors of enslaving women who are then made into open season targets as they effectively have no power to refuse sexual advances] 

 and Archippus our fellow soldier, and the church in your house:  3 Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.

 4 I thank my God always when I remember you in my prayers, 5 because I hear of your love and of the faith that you have toward the Lord Jesus and for all the saints, 6 and I pray that the sharing of your faith may become effective for the full knowledge of every good thing that is in us for the sake of Christ.1

 [--> Notice, allusion to the fullness of Christ agenda and to growing up in ethical knowledge as well as theological, pivoting on the redemptive gospel message]

  7 For I have derived much joy and comfort from your love, my brother, because the hearts of the saints have been refreshed through you.

 8 Accordingly, though I am bold enough in Christ to command you to do what is required, [--> he commands, speaking in Christ's voice but appeals for motivation through truth in love] 9 yet for love's sake I prefer to appeal to you—I, Paul, an old man and now a prisoner also for Christ Jesus— 10 I appeal to you for my child, Onesimus,2  whose father I became in my imprisonment [--> within brotherhood is parental relationship].

 11 (Formerly he was useless to you, but now he is indeed useful to you and to me. [--> a word play on his name and a hint of the circumstances of escape]) 12 I am sending him back to you, sending my very heart. [--> love] 13 I would have been glad to keep him with me, in order that he might serve me on your behalf during my imprisonment for the gospel, 14 but I preferred to do nothing without your consent [--> heart softening through the gospel] in order that your goodness might not be by compulsion but of your own accord.

[--> freedom acting through love and enlightenment, even in the face of evil and necessary correction by removal; in a circumstance where the apostle has social power to influence action. Reformation, not imposition]

 15 For this perhaps is why he was parted from you for a while, that you might have him back forever, 16 no longer as a bondservant3  but more than a bondservant, as a beloved brother [--> a brother: am I not a man and a brother? . . . a woman and a sister?] —especially to me, but how much more to you, both in the flesh and in the Lord. 

 17 So if you consider me your partner, receive him as you would receive me. [--> he is in my place, hence also in him Christ comes, asking, not for a cup of water but for freedom]

18 If he has wronged you at all, or owes you anything, charge that to my account. 19 I, Paul, write this with my own hand: I will repay it—to say nothing of your owing me even your own self. 

[--> formally undertakes debts due, so recognises that loss has potentially damaging impact to be ameliorated; doubtless the premise of providing a generous release endowment also obtains]

20 Yes, brother, I want some benefit from you in the Lord. Refresh my heart in Christ. 


 21 Confident of your obedience, I write to you, knowing that you will do even more than I say. 

22 At the same time, prepare a guest room for me, for I am hoping that through your prayers I will be graciously given to you.

 23 Epaphras, my fellow prisoner in Christ Jesus, sends greetings to you, 24 and so do Mark, Aristarchus, Demas, and Luke, my fellow workers. 

 25 The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit. [ESV]

We do not have here a detailed plan but a powerful, gracious, instructive example. One that would undermine slavery in the classical world and the early modern world alike. Where is is worth noting a later reference to a Bishop Onesimus, perhaps the same in later years. END

Friday, September 11, 2020

Part 4, On Scripture, other sources and how culture and the times do/should influence the focus & structure of systematised theology

 Obviously, theology is a discipline and systematic theology a significant sub-discipline. As such, they will naturally grow, develop and so change across time, in part due to growing understanding, in part to respond to new or re-opened "burning issues" of a given time and place, in part to respond to worldviews and cultural agendas concerns, in part to fresh cultural contexts or generation gaps etc. The question is, how can we do so while being faithful to the faith, once for all delivered to the saints . . . or, is there such an objectively definable core?

The last comes first, as it decides all else. 

To answer to it, let us recall where we closed off Part 3, with a clip from St Peter's theological will, c. 65 AD:

2 Peter 1: 16 For we did not follow cleverly devised myths when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty . . . . 

19 And we have the prophetic word more fully confirmed, to which you will do well to pay attention as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts, 20 knowing this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture comes from someone's own interpretation.

21 For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.

This clearly points to the centrality of the gospel message, its authenticity, roots in eyewitness testimony and in fulfillment of prophecy. Precisely the context we find in 1 Cor 15, the sermons in the Acts, the focus of the six principles of Heb 6:1 -2, John 3:16, The Lord's Prayer and elsewhere. In that light, the core, in outline will run much as the summary in say the 325/381 Nicene Creed:

We believe in one God the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible.

And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds, God of God, Light of Light, Very God of Very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father by whom all things were made; who for us men, and for our salvation, came down from heaven, and was incarnate by the Holy Spirit of the Virgin Mary, and was made man, and was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate. He suffered and was buried, and the third day he rose again according to the Scriptures, and ascended into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of the Father. And he shall come again with glory to judge both the quick and the dead, whose kingdom shall have no end.

And we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord and Giver of Life, who proceedeth from the Father and the Son, who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified, who spoke by the prophets. And we believe one holy catholic and apostolic Church. We acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins. And we look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. Amen.

Note, this point by point comparison with scripture.

With confidence in the 500 witnesses and in the prophecies, with our own experience of encounter with the living God through faith in Christ and a responsible answer to the attacks on the faith and scriptures in recent centuries, also respecting the fruit of centuries of work and our own knowledge and investigation of the scriptures, we should not be vulnerable to winds and waves of doctrine or the cunning and craftiness of deceitful schemers. And, we will have a basis to address the deeply entrenched doubts and skepticism we will certainly encounter in far too much of professional theology. (In this regard, the remarks of the late Eta Linnemann and others should give us pause.)

At the same time, there is genuine progress, often in response to circumstances, culture gaps, fresh insights and fresh burning issues. Relevance has to be objectively real and it has to address the felt concerns of the peoples of our Caribbean region and the wider world of our time with its outlook and with our growing sense that we are strategic for the global mission of the church. All of that, without getting unduly tangled up in and enmeshed by the fashionable intellectual currents and cultural/policy agendas of our day, or even agitprop promoted by ruthless ideologues seeking geostrategic advantage on the world stage. There is a father of lies, whose native tongue is deceit, and sadly he has many disciples.  

Where, as a result, the crooked yardstick principle obtains:


 

Where, further, we have the clear example of Paul at Athens, who found cultural bridging points, addressed worldviews issues and cultural contact points, using the known structure of the gospel without trying to fire off a chain of verses to those who would have no sense of the authenticity and relevance of the scriptures. Clearly, today, many are in a post-Christian form of the challenge he faced and so powerfully addressed at Mars Hill:

As I ponder the wreckage of our civilisation's intellectual heritage, I am convinced that an excellent point of general contact is with the first duties and principles of responsible reason, with linked reality root worldviews considerations:

We can readily identify at least seven inescapable first duties of reason. Inescapable, as they are so antecedent to reasoning that even the objector implicitly appeals to them; i.e. they are self-evident. Duties, 
-- to truth, 
-- to right reason, 
-- to prudence, 
-- to sound conscience, 
-- to neighbour, so also 
-- to fairness and justice etc
Such built in law is not invented by parliaments or courts, nor can these principles and duties be abolished by such. (Cf. Cicero in De Legibus, c. 50 BC.) Indeed, it is on this framework that we can set out to soundly understand and duly balance rights, freedoms and duties; which is justice. The legitimate main task of government, then, is to uphold and defend the civil peace of justice through sound community order reflecting the built in, intelligible law of our nature. Where, as my right implies your duty a true right is a binding moral claim to be respected in life, liberty, honestly aquired property, innocent reputation etc. To so justly claim a right, one must therefore demonstrably be in the right. Thus, too, we may compose sound civil law informed by that built-in law of our responsibly, rationally free morally governed nature; from such, we may identify what is unsound or false thus to be reformed or replaced even though enacted under the colour and solemn ceremonies of law. These duties, also, are a framework for understanding and articulating the corpus of built-in law of our morally governed nature, antecedent to civil laws and manifesting our roots in the Supreme Law-giver, the inherently good, utterly wise and just creator-God.

This last point can be drawn out a little more. For, in a world where first duties and principles of responsible reason are inescapable, the notorious IS-OUGHT gap must be bridged. Where, from Hume et al, we know that we cannot simply go x is so, y is so, z ought to be. No, we need to go to the root of reality, the foundational level, and there we need to recognise an is that inherently also grounds ought, so there is no room for a gap to crack open as say the notorious Euthyphro dilemma suggests.

After centuries of debate, there is just one serious candidate to bridge this. And if you doubt, simply propose an alternative ______ and justify at the bar of worldview comparative difficulties _______; the exercise will soon enough show the point. 

The sole serious candidate is a familiar figure: the inherently good and utterly wise creator God, a necessary and maximally great being. One, worthy of our loyalty and of the reasonable, responsible service of doing the good that accords with our evident nature.

There are many other facets, explored here on, in context.

Obviously, God as seen in the dim philosophical outline of generic ethical theism, can readily be connected to God as encountered in the gospel, the scriptures and real life encounter of life-transforming discipleship.

But how does all of this connect to theologising and systematisation, bridging general core and particular contexts, cultures, generations, times, issues, etc?

An obvious answer is the articulating power of the fullness of Christ principle that is most powerfully developed in Eph 1 and 4, informed by the Christ as cornerstone principle, in the further context of the operational form of our mandate presented in Eph 4:9 - 24 (and yes, the seven mountains community/culture/civilisation mapping model is useful too in helping us think through contexts, issues, dynamics, trends, challenges, strategic engagement etc -- leading to the 4R's progression framework).

First, the operational form of the mandate, leading to the 4R's framework as the gospel engages a community:



Second, we see here, an implied Bible and prophetic/eschatological timeline framework, which anchors our time and place to God's programme of redemption and culmination: 

creation --> fall --> family and nation --> covenant, prophetic nation --> messiah, hinge of prophecy --> fulfillment with witnesses in the gospel's passion core --> mission to the world --> "that Day" and culmination. 

In this light, messiah is already eschatological, and the last days were already in effect at Pentecost -- Peter, Ac 2:17 (quoting Joel 2), 

"in the last days it shall be, God declares, that I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh . . . .  32 This [prophesied, fulfilling, blessing, healing, betrayed, crucified] Jesus God raised up, and of that we all are witnesses. 33 Being therefore exalted at the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, he has poured out this that you yourselves are seeing and hearing . . . " 

-- and arguably all the way back to the days of Jeremiah, Daniel and Ezekiel when the famous seventy weeks clock was set in motion and when Daniel gave the explanation of Nebuchadnezzar's vision of dominant civilisations in the image of Nimrod and the stone cut without hands:

 


Third, personalising, this then focusses on the Heb 6:1 - 2 six first principles that are at the heart of the response of discipleship (where R1 is gateway to the six principles) and brings to central focus, Christ as cornerstone. Also, naturally drawing out the scripture principle and its flow in God's timeline:

Such then allows us to freely engage culture and context, calling people to discipleship and challenging nations to live in light of the gospel, under God:



So we see how the core can be recognised and how we can then bridge and use the fullness of Christ theme under the operational form of the gospel-bearing missionary mandate, to engage any particular issue, concern, cultural feature etc, X. Simplifying:

STEP 1: Identify X and map it to the adapted 7 M's framework, clarifying how it fits in in a society.

STEP 2: Recognise the core substantial faith once for all delivered to the saints and how its authenticity can be established generally and in the given context.

STEP 3: Recognise the Cornerstone principle, the linked programme of God's action, our missionary mandate and how the Christocentric fullness vision serves as an articulating, operationalising principle.

STEP 4: Consider again X as it is and what it would become, X* were it filled with Christ's redemptive, transforming power and just judgement.

STEP 5: Do a "gap analysis," X* - X = delta-X, defining the change and change process involved.

STEP 6: Is X redeemable or reformable, or would it have to go out of existence as it is intrinsically evil and destructive, not just warped by evils? (That is, X* = 0 so delta-X = -X.) If the latter, is that cessation credibly feasible now [why?], or is it only feasible in future or on "that day." In the latter cases, how can it be ameliorated, or how can we set a counter-cultural demonstration example, a foretaste of what will be in fullness at the coming?

STEP 7: If through general progress of gospel ethics, heart softening and sound advance of civilisation under reforming influence, abolition or major reformation/transformation are feasible today, how can this be carried forward through the church's acting as an embassy of the Kingdom of God?

STEP 8: Exert prophetic, intellectual and cultural leadership in respect to X, through the span of the gospel and its integral ethics; as a part of the church's operations under its mandate.

STEP 9: Integrate into the structure of theology and incorporate into the systematic framework in an appropriate way, in balance with the rest of what we must collectively be faithful to. 

Surely, that allows integration and contextualisation without sacrificing commitment to the core faith once for all delivered to the saints. END

Thursday, September 10, 2020

Part 3, Systematic Theology, the fullness theme, worldviews, cultural trends, policy agendas and evangelisation at kairos

 Obviously, in the general community and world (apart from regions led to recognise the authority of scripture) there will be little caring for the findings and claims of systematic theology. At the same time, the mission of the church is inextricably tied to Jesus' agenda of descending, ascending and filling all things (which does tie to systematics). 

The bridge between the two is the worldviews perspective, where the dominant worldview and world story of a given time and place will be tied to cultural trends, policy agendas (thus interests of dominant power factions) and so to the issues and challenges the church must face if it is to effectively seek to make disciples in the community.

Where, a worldview is a way of seeing the world and where we fit into it, based on core first plausibles that constitute a point of faith. And yes, everyone has a faith-point so too a faith commitment. For, as finite, fallible thinkers, our thought has to start somewhere:




Such is not new, in Athens, Paul did not quote scripture. Instead, he found a cultural bridging point, the famous altar to the unknown god and used that as a contact point for framing the Judaeo-Christian theistic worldview and our place in it, then going on to the core of the gospel. Let us particularly note where he began:



With these words, he tactfully but thoroughly broke the credibility of the whole system. For, the proud, erudite guardians of classical Western Civilisation's intellectual heritage, the heirs of Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and a thousand lesser lights, there in Athens (the very hometown of the tradition) had had to maintain a public monument to their ignorance on the central focus of knowledge. That is, the root of reality. To do so, he found a cultural bridge as point of contact and boldly drew out its implications; notice, he was not firing off Bible texts. 

This exposed at the outset, that they had no answer on the central question and could have no answer from their system.

He then opened the door to a new way forward, exerting prophetic intellectual and cultural leadership and thereby stating in summary the synthesis that would face scanty immediate results but which would ultimately hold the future of civilisation. Let's clip Luke's summary of what was likely a significantly more detailed presentation (but preserves the sheer power of the speech):

Ac 17:24 The God who made the world and everything in it, being Lord of heaven and earth, does not live in temples made by man,3  25 nor is he served by human hands, as though he needed anything, since he himself gives to all mankind life and breath and everything. 

26 And he made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined allotted periods [kairous, not just seasons but the hinges of history] and the boundaries of their dwelling place, 27 that they should seek God, and perhaps feel their way toward him and find him. Yet he is actually not far from each one of us, 28 for

 “‘In him we live and move and have our being’;4
as even some of your own poets have said,
“‘For we are indeed his offspring.’5  

[4, prob. Epimenides of Crete, who may have been
associated with the setting up of the altar; 5, Aratus'
poem, Phainomena]

Again, we see a reaching out across a cultural bridging point, meant to stir thought.

The apostle then continued, drawing attention to God as father and us as offspring (thus decisively answering racism and similar ills of thought):

 29 Being then God's offspring, we ought not to think that the divine being is like gold or silver or stone, an image formed by the art and imagination of man.

30 The times of ignorance God overlooked, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent, 31 because he has fixed a day on which he will judge the world in righteousness by a man whom he has appointed; and of this he has given assurance to all by raising him from the dead.”

Here, we come to the focus of the gospel, in words that echo the tightest summary of the faith once for all delivered unto the saints, John 3:16 and also Our Lord's Prayer. We are God's offspring, descendants of one man made by God, in nations, at places and pivotal times shaped by God to draw us -- even, blindly groping (as the altar demonstrated!) -- to himself. Where, he is not far from us for he is the root and sustainer of our very existence: in him we live, move and have our being.

So, now, we are at one of those hinges of all history, called to turn from the ignorance exemplified by a city full of idols, to love, return to and serve the Living God, our father. Thus, amplified, we must repent (and so trust him who justifies the wicked in accord with his Word and character), recognising that we live under the shadow of eternal judgement with an audit required of our thoughts, words, deeds. 

Of this, there is a general offer of proof to the world, a breakthrough miracle that cuts clean across our assumed inductive knowledge of the natural order; no inductive inference can rightly lock out rare exceptions to the commonly seen order -- never mind Hume et al. Namely, there is a man appointed as Judge, this being demonstrated by his resurrection from the dead. Of course, thereby fulfilling another sign, the prophecies of scripture and backed by over 500 eyewitnesses, most then being alive. 

It seems the apostle did not get a chance to elaborate here:

 32 Now when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some mocked. But others said, “We will hear you again about this.” 33 So Paul went out from their midst

Of course, initial response was scanty, but it was there:

 34 But some men joined him and believed, among whom also were Dionysius the Areopagite and a woman named Damaris and others with them.

That scantiness is not a proof of failure, as some have been tempted to imagine. It is a measure of the dominance of those in charge of mountains of influence under aegis of a prevailing worldview and cultural agenda. Never mind the monument that exposed the fatal crack in the foundation of their proud temple, these were dominant elites comfortable in their power and imagined intellectual superiority. 

But from those few, eventually Athens would become a Christian city in the heart of a Christian nation. Paul was literally laughed out of court, but the future belonged to the gospel, not to the speculations of the Epicureans and Stoics.  

Echoing the seven mountains framework:

. . . we may frame such an exercise in prophetic, intellectual and cultural leadership:


Where is the systematic theology? 

It is in the background, in the sound, structured and confident understanding of the Judaeo-Christian worldview and in its confidently made connexions from scripture to general first principles and considerations that point us to our roots in God, allowing us to soundly detect and correct key errors of thought, exposing also the fatal cracks in dominant community plausibility structures and linked power balances. Here, Locke, in opening remarks for his Essay on Human Understanding, has some choice words that today's heirs of the men of the Areopagus would do well to learn and heed:

Men have reason to be well satisfied with what God hath thought fit for them, since he hath given them (as St. Peter says [NB: i.e. 2 Pet 1:2 - 4]) pana pros zoen kaieusebeian, whatsoever is necessary for the conveniences of life and information of virtue; and has put within the reach of their discovery, the comfortable provision for this life, and the way that leads to a better. How short soever their knowledge may come of an universal or perfect comprehension of whatsoever is, it yet secures their great concernments [Prov 1: 1 - 7], that they have light enough to lead them to the knowledge of their Maker, and the sight of their own duties [cf Rom 1 - 2 & 13, Ac 17, Jn 3:19 - 21, Eph 4:17 - 24, Isaiah 5:18 & 20 - 21, Jer. 2:13Titus 2:11 - 14 etc, etc]. Men may find matter sufficient to busy their heads, and employ their hands with variety, delight, and satisfaction, if they will not boldly quarrel with their own constitution, and throw away the blessings their hands are filled with, because they are not big enough to grasp everything . . . It will be no excuse to an idle and untoward servant [Matt 24:42 - 51], who would not attend his business by candle light, to plead that he had not broad sunshine. The Candle that is set up in us [Prov 20:27] shines bright enough for all our purposes . . . If we will disbelieve everything, because we cannot certainly know all things, we shall do muchwhat as wisely as he who would not use his legs, but sit still and perish, because he had no wings to fly. [Section 5, Emphases added.Text references also added, to document the sources of Locke's biblical allusions and citations. Yes, they are indeed patently there.]

 Similarly, in Ch 2 Section 5 of his Second Treatise on Civil Government, he cited Canon Richard Hooker from his Ecclesiastical Polity, framing foundations of Government, law and sound community life:

. . . if I cannot but wish to receive good, even as much at every man's hands, as any man can wish unto his own soul, how should I look to have any part of my desire herein satisfied, unless myself be careful to satisfy the like desire which is undoubtedly in other men . . . my desire, therefore, to be loved of my equals in Nature, as much as possible may be, imposeth upon me a natural duty of bearing to themward fully the like affection. From which relation of equality between ourselves and them that are as ourselves, what several rules and canons natural reason hath drawn for direction of life no man is ignorant . . . [Hooker then continues, citing Aristotle in The Nicomachean Ethics, Bk 8:] as namely, That because we would take no harm, we must therefore do none; That since we would not be in any thing extremely dealt with, we must ourselves avoid all extremity in our dealings; That from all violence and wrong we are utterly to abstain, with such-like . . . ] [Eccl. Polity,preface, Bk I, "ch." 8, p.80, cf. here. Emphasis added.]

This draws out the importance of systematic thinking about our faith and how it extends into the heart of a worldview, speaking onward into reformation of the community order through the power of transformed lives. These words, of course, directly and powerfully shaped the development of modern liberty and democracy, also pointing to the cultural buttresses that are necessary if it is not to fall prey to the cunning and craftiness of deceitfully scheming men, the manipulated mob and chaos. It is worth pausing to again draw out from the heavily loaded paragraph we cited last time:

We can readily identify at least seven inescapable first duties of reason. Inescapable, as they are so antecedent to reasoning that even the objector implicitly appeals to them; i.e. they are self-evident. Duties, 
-- to truth, 
-- to right reason, 
-- to prudence, 
-- to sound conscience, 
-- to neighbour, so also 
-- to fairness and justice etc
Such built in law is not invented by parliaments or courts, nor can these principles and duties be abolished by such. (Cf. Cicero in De Legibus, c. 50 BC.) Indeed, it is on this framework that we can set out to soundly understand and duly balance rights, freedoms and duties; which is justice. The legitimate main task of government, then, is to uphold and defend the civil peace of justice through sound community order reflecting the built in, intelligible law of our nature. Where, as my right implies your duty a true right is a binding moral claim to be respected in life, liberty, honestly aquired property, innocent reputation etc. To so justly claim a right, one must therefore demonstrably be in the right. Thus, too, we may compose sound civil law informed by that built-in law of our responsibly, rationally free morally governed nature; from such, we may identify what is unsound or false thus to be reformed or replaced even though enacted under the colour and solemn ceremonies of law. These duties, also, are a framework for understanding and articulating the corpus of built-in law of our morally governed nature, antecedent to civil laws and manifesting our roots in the Supreme Law-giver, the inherently good, utterly wise and just creator-God.

This last point can be drawn out a little more. For, in a world where first duties and principles of responsible reason are inescapable, the notorious IS-OUGHT gap must be bridged. Where, from Hume et al, we know that we cannot simply go x is so, y is so, z ought to be. No, we need to go to the root of reality, the foundational level, and there we need to recognise an is that inherently also grounds ought, so there is no room for a gap to crack open as say the notorious Euthyphro dilemma suggests.

After centuries of debate, there is just one serious candidate to bridge this. And if you doubt, simply propose an alternative ______ and justify at the bar of worldview comparative difficulties _______; the exercise will soon enough show the point. 

The sole serious candidate is a familiar figure: the inherently good and utterly wise creator God, a necessary and maximally great being. One, worthy of our loyalty and of the reasonable, responsible service of doing the good that accords with our evident nature.

"Necessary" points to logic of being and the possible worlds context (vital in an age where many speculate about multiverses):

A possible world is in effect a sufficiently complete description of the way the or a world is or might be or might have been, a cluster of mutually consistent propositions. (What is, and what accurately describes what is must all be so together.) So, if a being must be present in all possible worlds -- is necessary -- that is because it is part of the framework for any world to exist. For example, once distinct identity obtains, any world W may be partitioned W = {A|~A} so two-ness must exist and with it a whole panoply of numbers and truths about numbers. That is why, Mathematics [the study of the logic of structure and quantity) has universally applicable aspects. [See here and discussion here.]

Thus, necessary beings are present as framework for any actual world, including our own, not just contingent beings such as we are. A key issue here is, that a world is not spun up from utter non-being, for no cause; such a true nothing can have no causal powers. Were there ever utter nothing, that would forever be the case. If a world is, SOMETHING -- something necessary -- always was. The issue is, of what character.

BTW, this highlights a gap in our education, which makes our plausibility structures warped and cracked. We are not exposed to logic of being and so these concepts seem strange or even implausible when in fact they are necessary.

As a linked property, necessary beings are not caused or dependent on other beings, so they never began nor can they cease; they are eternal. Boom, the eternality of The Great I AM is not an arbitrary construct spun out of our imaginations just as a spider weaves a web out of its own substance. 

Similarly, maximal greatness, i.e. perfection of being implies that in God there are no arbitrary or capricious features such as would be found in an imperfect or evil being. God is inherently, utterly good, embracing only and all great-making core characteristics to maximal compossible degree. That is, God is supremely good, great, wise, powerful, knowing, pure, loving etc. All, together. These of course, point to attributes of God commonly discussed through pondering the scriptures.

Unsurprising, all truths must be so together and will in some small way reflect the root of reality.

With such in mind, let us again hear Paul, AD 57, seven years after his speech on Mars Hill (or perhaps in the neighbouring Agora):

Rom 1: 18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. 

19 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world,7  in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. 

21 For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools, 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things . . . . 

2:14 For when Gentiles, who do not have the law, by nature do what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. 15 They show that the work of the law is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness, and their conflicting thoughts accuse or even excuse them . . . . 

13: 8 Owe no one anything, except to love each other, for the one who loves another has fulfilled the law. 9 For the commandments, “You shall not commit adultery, You shall not murder, You shall not steal, You shall not covet,” and any other commandment, are summed up in this word: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” 10 Love does no wrong to a neighbor; therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.

These are precisely the issues we have been drawing out, echoing Locke. And, let us note, that we find here a limited endorsement of what has been called natural theology; that in responsible, rational, morally governed freedom lie inescapable first principles and duties that point to our Root. Point, along with many signs and features of the world around us. Point, with sufficient force that we are without excuse should we refuse to acknowledge God. Though of course we can so construct dominant worldviews, cultural narratives and agendas underpinned by pillars of influence and power, that our civilisation suppresses what it should acknowledge. 

As, is patently increasingly the case in the Caribbean.

Let us turn from such suicidal folly and let us ponder Him who is our Father, root of our existence, and our place in our world, our sin-challenge and the solution through redemption. For, God has set a day of eternal audit and has given proof thereof to all men by raising one from the dead in fulfillment of prophecy.

So too, in the words of Peter, c 65 AD:

2 Peter 1: 16 For we did not follow cleverly devised myths when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty . . . . 

19 And we have the prophetic word more fully confirmed, to which you will do well to pay attention as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts, 20 knowing this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture comes from someone's own interpretation.

21 For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.

Let us heed that sure Word, the faith once for all delivered unto the saints. END

Wednesday, September 09, 2020

Part 2: Systematic Theology, the fullness of Christ theme and cultural engagement/relevance

 One of the issues facing Systematic Theology is whether it is relevant to or can be communicated winsomely to people cross-culturally or in a situation where there is strong diversity in a community -- and where there is always a huge challenge to reach people with limited education, worldview and cultural influences, life experiences, assumptions and perceptions and more. Where, also, mere declarative relevance is never enough in an increasingly post-Christian context. 

So, we face the question of a theology relevant to the contemporary and future Caribbean and world beyond.

Step one, is that we need a way to map and understand community factors, forces and trends, so that we will be able to think strategically and act operationally. For that (and without endorsing what others may say about Mr Wallnau et al or even originators such as Dr Francis Schaeffer, Bill Bright and Loren Cunningham back in the '70's), for some years now, I have found the seven mountains model, as I have adapted it, helpful:


We can also interpret it as a Greek-style temple with seven pillars and a roof. The issue is that there is a two-way interaction between key social institutions and a dominant worldview with its "narratives" and policy agendas. Where, once a business as usual system exists, it is very hard for it to be transformationally changed save through crisis:


That of course points to counter-culture strategies where the church is an embassy of the Kingdom of God, pleading the case for reconciliation with God:

2 Cor 5:20 Therefore, we are ambassadors for Christ, God making his appeal through us. We implore you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God. [ESV]

. . . while, modelling a new culture:

Titus 2: 11 For the grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation for all people, 12 training us to renounce ungodliness and worldly passions, and to live self-controlled, upright, and godly lives in the present age, 13 waiting for our blessed hope, the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ, 14 who gave himself for us to redeem us from all lawlessness and to purify for himself a people for his own possession who are zealous for good works.

This then provides godly, prophetic intellectual and cultural leadership and sound discipleship-based service that sets an example that prepares us to be the good people in the storm of crisis:

Eph 4: 17 Now this I say and testify in the Lord, that you must no longer walk as the Gentiles do, in the futility of their minds. 18 They are darkened in their understanding, alienated from the life of God because of the ignorance that is in them, due to their hardness of heart. 

19 They have become callous and have given themselves up to sensuality, greedy to practice every kind of impurity. 

20 But that is not the way you learned Christ!— 21 assuming that you have heard about him and were taught in him, as the truth is in Jesus, 22 to put off your old self,6  which belongs to your former manner of life and is corrupt through deceitful desires, 23 and to be renewed in the spirit of your minds, 24 and to put on the new self, created after the likeness of God in true righteousness and holiness.

Q: But, how does all of this connect to systematic theology?

ANS: Through a too often neglected facet of Christology, Ecclesiology and Missiology -- the systematic study of Christ, the Church and its global mission. Namely, the fullness of Christ theme. Let's look a little higher in Eph 4:

Eph 4: 9 ( In saying, “He ascended,” what does it mean but that he had also descended into the lower regions, the earth?2  10 He who descended is the one who also ascended far above all the heavens, that he might fill all things.) 

11 And he gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the shepherds3  and teachers,4  

-- 12 to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ, 

-- 13 until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood,5 

--  to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ, 

-- 14 so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro by the waves and carried about by every wind of doctrine, by human cunning, by craftiness in deceitful schemes. 

15 Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ, 16 from whom the whole body, joined and held together by every joint with which it is equipped, when each part is working properly, makes the body grow so that it builds itself up in love.

This of course ties directly to our vision of the Christ and his mission, thus the gospel core of the faith once for all delivered to the saints. He came as messiah, loved, served, healed, delivered, rescued, served. He was targetted by many conspiracies until one succeeded, one led by corrupt Jewish and Pagan elites playing out their dirty power games. So, we come to an execution between two rebel brigands outside Jerusalem's northern gates, with an inscription over his head in Aramaic, Greek and Latin; languages of a polyglot civilisation pivoting on the heritage of three key cities: Jerusalem, Athens and Rome. Nailed him!

But, he didn't stay nailed. Against all the order of nature but in fulfillment of prophecies 700 years before the time in Isaiah 53, he rose from death, commissioned the church, ascended to his Father and poured out the Spirit jointly with his Father in resurrection power. As, Peter preached in the very first sermon of the church. And so, that sermon culminates:

Acts 2:32 This Jesus God raised up, and of that we all are witnesses. 33 Being therefore exalted at the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, he has poured out this that you yourselves are seeing and hearing. 34 For David did not ascend into the heavens, but he himself says,

 “‘The Lord said to my Lord,
“Sit at my right hand,
 35 until I make your enemies your footstool.”’ 

 36 Let all the house of Israel therefore know for certain that God has made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom you crucified.” 

 37 Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?” 

38 And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. 

39 For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.”

Thus, we may now look at Eph 4 with this side-light. Jesus came, descending and ascending in order to -- purpose -- fill all things. He is Lord and Saviour, Son of God and God the Son, the one before whom every knee shall bow and every tongue swear. In that context he is head of the body, the church comprising all who believe and are serving through the truth in love, with purity and resurrection power. He gave the famous five fold ministries as equipping services that empower us in that body of service. Obviously, our spiritual gifts are enablings for that service, and indeed we are indwelt and empowered by the Spirit, this is how we are the body of Christ manifest on earth even now; however imperfectly. 

Where, we grow in unity and knowledge of the Son of God to mature manhood, the image of the stature of the fullness of Christ.

That is, it is through the church, its witness, discipleship, service that Christ gradually, growing-ly, fills all things. With obvious culmination at his return. But already, we are a microcosm, a partial, imperfect, immature but growing manifestation and model of that fullness in the here and now, in families, communities, nations, civilisations, the whole world. thus, we become a counter culture and source of reformation. Which of course implies our relevance and the relevance of the faith once for all delivered to the saints for all peoples everywhere in each generation.

As I have pictured this engagement, using the 4 R's framework, there is a progression:


That impact leads to a general principle, the Gospel Ethics reformation Principle:

GERP: the gospel and discipleship, by direct implications of built-in gospel ethics, inherently have strong reforming, civilising, positively transformational influence. 

 Something, that was once so generally recognised as undeniable fact, that Jesus was regarded by common acclaim as one of the all time great teachers and reformers of our morally struggling, hypocrisy plagued race; simply contemplate the all time most famous sermon ever, the Sermon on the Mount.  

But, then, even our struggle to overcome our hypocrisy and moral inconsistency implies acknowledgement that we are morally governed through inescapable first duties. So stubborn and self-serving are we that it bears repeating, this specifically includes duties such as those to truth, to right reason, to prudence, to sound conscience, to neighbour, thus, too, to fairness and justice, etc.

From this, it is possible to frame law and an agenda for reformationof civilisaiton. Allow me to summarise in a heavily loaded paragraph:

We can readily identify at least seven inescapable first duties of reason. Inescapable, as they are so antecedent to reasoning that even the objector implicitly appeals to them; i.e. they are self-evident. Duties, 
-- to truth, 
-- to right reason, 
-- to prudence, 
-- to sound conscience, 
-- to neighbour, so also 
-- to fairness and justice etc
Such built in law is not invented by parliaments or courts, nor can these principles and duties be abolished by such. (Cf. Cicero in De Legibus, c. 50 BC.) Indeed, it is on this framework that we can set out to soundly understand and duly balance rights, freedoms and duties; which is justice. The legitimate main task of government, then, is to uphold and defend the civil peace of justice through sound community order reflecting the built in, intelligible law of our nature. Where, as my right implies your duty a true right is a binding moral claim to be respected in life, liberty, honestly aquired property, innocent reputation etc. To so justly claim a right, one must therefore demonstrably be in the right. Thus, too, we may compose sound civil law informed by that built-in law of our responsibly, rationally free morally governed nature; from such, we may identify what is unsound or false thus to be reformed or replaced even though enacted under the colour and solemn ceremonies of law. These duties, also, are a framework for understanding and articulating the corpus of built-in law of our morally governed nature, antecedent to civil laws and manifesting our roots in the Supreme Law-giver, the inherently good, utterly wise and just creator-God.

Where, already, we see that this comes full circle to evidence pointing to God as the root of reality. In Paul's words in Rom 1:

Rom 1: 19 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20 For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world,7  in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. 21 For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened.

Where, let us note a parallel to Eph 4:14, and 17 - 19: it is rebellion against God and his voice in creation and in our own hearts that dulls the conscience and en-darkens the mind, rendering us vulnerable to winds and waves of doctrine and to the cunning and craftiness of men in their deceitful scheming. Beyond this, Eph 4 shows how evils are addictive, ensnaring, pulling us ever deeper into a quicksand of self-destructive sin. All of which patently has implications for societies of the spirit of Nimrod, erected in part in rebellion against God:

Gen 10: 8 Cush fathered Nimrod; he was the first on earth to be a mighty man.1  9 He was a mighty hunter before the LORD. Therefore it is said, “Like Nimrod a mighty hunter before the LORD.” 10 The beginning of his kingdom was Babel [city of rebellion scattered by God], Erech, Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar. 11 From that land he went into Assyria and built Nineveh, Rehoboth-Ir, Calah, and 12 Resen between Nineveh and Calah; that is the great city.

The gospel obviously brings a reforming model and critique, calling to repentance and reformation.

But there is a subtler side. Notice from Eph 4, that it is the mature who are not vulnerable to deception, confusion and con games of wicked men. Insofar as the church is immature, in need of strengthening, it too will be vulnerable. And woe betide the church where such weakness extends to its leadership;something that all too readily explains some of the sorrier chapters of the history of church and civilisation.

So, let us heed Ac 2 and 11:

Ac 2:40 And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.” 41 So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls.

 42 And they devoted themselves to the apostles' teaching and the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers. 43 And awe5  came upon every soul, and many wonders and signs were being done through the apostles. 44 And all who believed were together and had all things in common. 45 And they were selling their possessions and belongings and distributing the proceeds to all, as any had need. 46 And day by day, attending the temple together and breaking bread in their homes, they received their food with glad and generous hearts, 47 praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord added to their number day by day those who were being saved.
with . . . 

Ac 11: 19 Now those who were scattered because of the persecution that arose over Stephen [~ mid 30's] traveled as far as Phoenicia and Cyprus and Antioch, speaking the word to no one except Jews. 

20 But there were some of them [some time later], men of Cyprus and Cyrene, who on coming to Antioch spoke to the Hellenists3  also, preaching the Lord Jesus. 21 And the hand of the Lord was with them, and a great number who believed turned to the Lord. 

22 The report of this came to the ears of the church in Jerusalem, and they sent Barnabas to Antioch. 23 When he came and saw the grace of God, he was glad, and he exhorted them all to remain faithful to the Lord with steadfast purpose, 24 for he was a good man, full of the Holy Spirit and of faith. And a great many people were added to the Lord. 25 So Barnabas went to Tarsus to look for Saul, 26 and when he had found him, he brought him to Antioch. 

For a whole year they met with the church and taught a great many people [mid 40's]. And in Antioch the disciples were first called Christians.

Antioch became Paul's Missions-sending base and a great centre of the faith for many centuries.

So, we see a powerful coherence that ties the reaching out to the nations back to the core of the faith, and that the fullness of Christ theme is pivotal to that. More to follow DV. END