"J'Accuse . . .!" 7: The toxic fog of dirty money and its likely undue influence on issues, debates, dominant media narratives, what is passed off as "knowledge," policy agendas and culture shifts . . .

 Yes, I am noticing that ongoing investigations in the US are turning up that it is credible huge sectors of the US Government could not pass a basic audit (starting with their Defense Department and possibly USAID). US$ 4.7 trillion has been put out there:

DOGE discovers $4.7 trillion in Treasury payments were missing critical code: ‘Traceability almost impossible’ . . . . The transactions were reportedly missing the Treasury Account Symbol (TAS), an identification code which links a Treasury payment to a budget line item, according to DOGE, which described the use of such code as a “standard financial process.” “In the Federal Government, the TAS field was optional for ~$4.7 Trillion in payments and was often left blank, making traceability almost impossible,” read an X post from DOGE. [If you doubt this case, reflect on the litany here, and the discussion on waste here. (Ponder, too, the USAID discussions here and here.)]

Yes, this massive violation of generally accepted accounting practice -- "no paper trail, no payment" --  as well as of well known standards of budgeting -- "no budget line passed by the Legislature or Board (etc), no payment" -- calls for serious questions, not only in the US but globally. 

So, another letter:

Dear Intelligentsia,

Given that:

 

1: the US taxpayer is the source of -- by far and away -- the largest pool of mobile funds in the world, and

 

2: that there are significant signs of unprecedented waste, fraud and abuse, where too money is ever so mobile AND

 

3: we see clear signs/reasons  to infer massive, broad-scale ideological corruption of institutions, markets, agendas of Overton Window "acceptable" options, thus resulting policies, bodies of knowledge, information and more,

_________________ 

C: we need to ask pointed questions on policy and institutional trends and shifts in recent years.

 

Solomon warned that money answers to all things, and we know that by and large everything and everyone has a price. This, is riding on the similar corruption led by the Politburo of the late un-lamented USSR (added to hundreds of billions from the ME oil patch used to influence institutions and advance jihad, multiplied by similar Chinese money and drugs trade global black market money).

So, we should be highly suspicious of where the Overton Window now is, given reason to suspect a LOT of dirty money and linked power influences. 

Including, in whatever is now media-pushed conventional wisdom and so-called established "scientific consensus" and other "reputable" "knowledge" and opinion.

In short, we now need a radical, from the ground up, reassessment, including on what we imagine are credible sources, authorities, consensus, conventional wisdom and more. 

Yes, there is a hidden, global crisis of confidence. (And no, we must not let Trump bashing distract us from facing hard, hard facts.)

So, let's at least outline the target-rich environment, with a little help from the seven mountains mapping model . . . 

The seven mountains mapping model will help us to begin to get a handle on how huge dirty money can corrupt "everything," raising suspicions that we now have a cluster of pools of out of control money that could buy a lot of very bad things globally. 

Yes, big money backed cultural and policy agendas can hijack our key institutions of influence, leading to a "business as usual" agenda that heads over the Acts 27 cliff:

Sobering.

BTW, back in 2016, I put this world map based geostrategic analysis on the table:

And, back in the 90's, I began to see a two tidal waves vision:

While we are at it, on September 11, 2001, apart from plans for nuclear weapons, I found this map of radical Islam-IST global intent and 100-year world subjugation agenda online:

Sounds worryingly familiar?

That should awaken our deep concerns, bigtime!

Professor Bain, c. 2014

For the Caribbean, a very good place to begin is UWI's 2014 firing of the man who pioneered HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention in the Caribbean, Professor Brendan Bain; after he gave sound expert testimony on a buggery case in Belize. It was obvious that US-funding was used as a lever to push him out and to marginalise him. This instantly tainted UWI and our regional education, medicine and linked government and non-government systems. And since then, business as usual has proceeded apace, as though nothing untoward had happened.

Dots, we can now connect to a global dirty money issue.

Going further, once we look at the PANCAP initiative's documents, we find some telling clues.

We see here, already, reason to be deeply concerned.  Notice, twenty years ago, AGE OF CONSENT LAW was being challenged in the name of "HIV prevention," not just Buggery Acts (which are about inherently unhealthy, insanitary, disease-spreading behaviour, not attitudes or feelings).  

All, under imprimatur of a Prime Minister of St Kitts-Nevis.

Note -- Google would-be censors kindly take due note -- contrary to activist Dr Carolyn Gomes 

[who claimed that this PANCAP document represents the regional consensus to which Dr Bain was an alleged part, and is a smoking gun on how he has broken trust with the agreed consensus that we must do away with Buggery Laws in order to allow a greater reach of HIV-AIDS efforts to homosexuals], 

we can clip how at the time:

the UNAIDS 2012 report on the reach of Jamaica's HIV-AIDS programme (spearheaded by Dr Bain) shows that in Jamaica there is a reach to 87% of MSMs as contrasted with 69% in Germany and 39% in Brazil. So, having Buggery Laws on the books does not prevent having world class reach.

That twisting of the law, questionable appealing to alleged "consensus" and attack on protective, age of consent legislation are already big clues that a questionable -- frankly, outright dubious -- agenda was riding on the back of a significant regional health issue. 

Using much the same case, notice, what was published by UWI Press, authored by a Prime Minister of Barbados (and edited by the wife of a Prime Minister of St Lucia who headed one of UWI's Law Schools):

This, is a direct, evade-the-issue, knock- over- a- strawman tactic attack on Gospel Ethics (thus, the gospel and the Christian faith as well as its endorsement of conscience-attested, creation order rooted core natural law . . . start with, what is a right and who gets to set up what is a right).

So, the dirty money agenda is anti-Christian and anti-Civilisational. As can be seen from ever so many other cases across the whole world. While there are too many cases to mention and detail, maybe a few suggestions are in order:

• Is "Scientific Consensus" any more credible than, who is signing the cheques?
• In particular, was the Covid-19 - vaccine issue driven by the actual merits or by a dirty money funded juggernaut?
• Similarly, on "Climate Change" and "Renewable Energy" issues, consensus is often appealed to (But, SCIENCE DOES NOT ADVANCE BY CONSENSUS, AKA "APPEAL TO AUTHORITY" -- AS IS WELL KNOWN . . . just consider "Paradigm shifts" and "Scientific revolutions")
• On Origins, there has been a suspicious lockout of dissent, with propagandistic tainting and marginalisation of dissent
• Wikipedia shows a persistent cultural marxist and radical secularist bias, while being a not for profit funded through donations . . . an obvious target for dirty money.
• How much of the troll-swarming on the Internet is really dirty money talking?
• How much of what is in our newspapers or on major TV channels is bought and paid for by dirty money?
• Thus, how much of the main policy, economic, social, cultural, morality, law etc debate is utterly tainted by dirty money?
• Worse, how much of what is NOT mentioned at all reflects the Voldemort -- he who cannot be named -- effect (i.e. intimidation, silencing and censorship)?

Voldemort effect? Yes . . . 

It is clear that we need to do a major spring cleaning. 

Time, to roll up our sleeves. END