As the Third Christian Millennium dawns, the Caribbean is at kairos: the nexus of opportunity and risk. In light of the Christocentric fulness theme of Ephesians 4:9 - 24, perspectives and counsel will be offered to support reformation, transformation and blessing towards a truly sustainable future under God.
. . . through its constant escalation of its nuclear programme. As CNBC summarises:
Pyongyang's ongoing nuclear aggression may potentially result in South Korea and Japan hosting nuclear weapons on their own turf, a scenario that would have wide-ranging negative consequences, Singapore's leader has warned.
"What's different this time is that North Korea has more nuclear weapons ... so the risks are higher," Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said in an interview with CNBC on Thursday.
The scenario being suggested is placement of US tactical nukes on their soil. Not nice, but there may be but little option.
However, longer term implications of North Korean recklessness point to Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Australia going nuclear in their own right. Not good, but it seems that patience since the early 1990's simply gave time for the Kims to move ahead on nukes. END
Sometimes, sobering reality has a power all of its own.
Here -- video, NYT transcript -- is Gen. Kelly of the US Marine Corps and White House Chief of Staff on making the call to next of kin of those killed in action: His key comment (made to US President Trump): "sir, there’s nothing you can do to lighten the burden on these families . . . " Let us understand, and -- if it is possible at this late stage in the death spiral of a civilisation -- let us learn sobriety once more. END
Thanks to a friend, I have some follow-up links to yesterday's post: 1] Sixteen questions that needed to be answered (a few have subsequently been addressed): Idaho Congressional candidate Michael Snyder raised some pointed questions, prefacing:
The public is not being told the truth about what really went down in Las Vegas. As you will see below, the evidence is mounting that there were multiple shooters and that this was an operation that was planned well in advance. But according to the mainstream media, a 64-year-old retired accountant with a flabby physique who had no military training whatsoever and wasn't very experienced with guns was able to pull the whole thing off all by himself. We are being told that Paddock was a "lone wolf" who didn't have any ties to terror groups, and since he is now dead, nobody is ever going to be able to interrogate him. But the American people definitely deserve some answers about what took place, and that means all of us should keep digging.
The following are 16 unanswered questions about the Las Vegas shooting that the mainstream media does not want to talk about . . .
2] The attack-dog journalism response led to an onward response: Michael Snyder responded to attacks in the media for asking his sixteen questions, starting:
I didn't expect that I would be getting "the Trump treatment" this early in the campaign. Last week, I wrote an article about the Las Vegas shooting that posed 16 questions I did not feel were being addressed by the mainstream media adequately enough. That article was picked up by Zero Hedge, and it has now been read more than 1.6 million times.
All along, I have never claimed to know exactly what happened in Las Vegas. But I feel very strongly that there is nothing wrong with asking questions. In the old days, that is what real journalists would actually do. Unfortunately, the art of critical thinking has almost entirely disappeared from the field of journalism, and so it is up to us in the alternative media to ask the hard questions that "professional journalists" used to pursue.
The emails have been pouring in from many others who also have serious questions about what happened in Las Vegas, but according to the Idaho Statesman, it was improper for me to ever raise any of these questions at all . . .
3] Natural News raised questions about the plausibility of the claimed lone wolf shooter carrying out the attack (noting that the issue is whether he could have acted ALONE to effect the attack):
Even highly trained Navy Seals would have a difficult time running a full auto weapon for 10 minutes straight.
Such weapon systems are brutal on the operator. They require tremendous
strength, stamina and expert troubleshooting to keep running. Full-auto
weapons overheat and jam. They demand incredible strength to keep aimed
on target. They require expert reloading and weapons clearing in the
case of jams, and the hotel room would have been so full of smoke and
powder residue that it would be almost impossible to keep breathing from
that enclosed space.
Far from what the firearms-illiterate media claims, these are not
systems that any Joe off the street can just pick up and use to
effortlessly mow down 500 people. Running these systems requires
extensive training, experience and stamina. It is physically impossible
for a guy like Stephen Paddock to operate such a system in the
sustained, effective manner that we witnessed, especially when shooting
from an elevated position which throws off all the ranging of the weapon
system.
Far from being a Navy Seal, Stephen Paddock is a retired accountant
senior citizen with a gambling problem and a flabby physique . . .
4] Acoustic evidence is being raised as indicating a second shooter NOT in the Mandalay Hotel:
After a detailed forensic acoustics analysis rooted in science and physics, I have affirmatively identified the range / distance of a second shooter
at the Las Vegas massacre. A detailed analysis video, complete with two
whiteboards explaining the acoustics science, will be posted here this
Tuesday.
UPDATE: The video has now been released! See the full video, below…
I have also forensically confirmed that some rifle rounds were,
indeed, coming from a range that is consistent with the distance of the
Mandalay Bay hotel. This analysis is rooted in bullet time of flight
acoustic analysis (forensic acoustics), and it is irrefutable proof
based on the laws of physics. These are bombshell revelations
that may change the course of the investigation. All the math will be
clearly spelled out for you in the upcoming video to be posted here on
Tuesday.
To repeat: YES, my analysis confirms that at least one shooter was
almost certainly positioned at the Mandalay Bay. But a second shooter is
also clearly identified at a significantly closer range through
forensic acoustic analysis. I repeat: There were at least TWO shooters in play,
operating at two very different ranges. One of these ranges is much
closer to the concert venue than the Mandalay Bay property. The evidence
is already encoded in all the audio of all the videos posted on
YouTube . . .
Vid no 1: Vid no 2: (NB: The videos -- apparently unknowingly -- present a form of "crack-thump" analysis. The sharp, high frequency cracks heard are more likely to be sonic booms from supersonic rounds passing near the microphones on the cell phones being used to capture most of the recordings we can see, not pavement hits. With, the thumps being the reports from the discharge of the firearms. And yes, the similar crack of a whip is a miniature sonic boom as the tip speeds up. Lag time analysis is used also for things like estimating range of an earthquake due to different arrival times of P and S waves that typically travel at 5 and 3 km/s. The method is fundamentally sound, the results need to be confirmed by others.)
While the above is not an endorsement, it is a drawing together of evidence that needs to be pondered to gain a more balanced picture than is present in the dominant media narratives. And, the need for that for many, many topics, is the underlying reason for this post and the one yesterday. END
This takes away the underpinnings for the narrative that the guard precipitated the ending of the incident. As at now the 72 minute delay before a SWAT team broke into the prime suspect's room remains as an unexplained but disturbing point. Especially, if a security guard went down wounded under a hail of fire reported to be 200 rounds sent down the hall-way. Surely, that should have triggered guests on that or nearby floors to call security and/or 9/11. BEFORE the headlined attack began. Then, we have the note originally thought to be a suicide note. Nope, a bullet-drop ballistic calculation for the 300 - 400 m to the concert venue, compounded by 32nd floor elevation, maybe ~ 100 m up. Such points to someone with significant knowledge of shooting. Which, is doubly inconsistent with the videos and narrative.
First, serious shooters typically use short, 5 - 7 round bursts with automatic weapons, as this is easier to control and better manages the heat and riding-up due to recoil problems. We were seeing long bursts. Second, a bump fire stock does not sound like a reasonable means of getting rapid fire for long bursts while preserving the sort of accuracy implied by doing a bullet drop calculation. Especially when the target is an area, a concert with 20,000 people and choke-point entrance/exit. And, with Mexico nearby so full automatic weapons were available to someone with the sort of means being described. Likewise, it is questionable that someone like that would put faith in illegal adaptations to full automatic capacity unless done by a serious expert. Bump fire stocks do not fit. Cessation after 9 minutes with maybe 1/2 the ammunition available unexpended and many available guns unfired also does not make sense, especially as the SWAT team was long delayed. In short, things don't add up and dominant media narratives are unravelling for those who are paying close, critical-minded attention. And that's before we get to the shooter profile.
(BTW, it's a little ironic that "303" is the common name for a famous British issue rifle, the Lee-Enfield, and its round.) First, we need some appreciation of the strip:
Next, a 3-D look:
Now, Alex Jones is not a source I generally endorse, but this interview with a former Intel billet military officer and survivalist should give pause -- especially the video showing overlapping, distinct streams of automatic gunfire and that showing near and distant fire. Such point to multiple shooters.
Where, the presence early on of an extremely long burst -- some estimate 120 - 140 rounds -- near the start of the incident made me at first wonder if we were not seeing an AK47 with a 75 round drum magazine. There are 100 round magazines available for the M16 family. But the burst seems to be 20 - 40% longer than anything like that accounts for; the suggestion is that we had here a belt-fed machine gun, similar to an M60 or M240, in addition to rifles with magazines up to 60 or 100 rounds, and it seems a significant number of standard 30 round magazines. With a drug war going on in Mexico, access to such is not a problem. Jones video: Similarly, this video from a YouTube Channel shows evidence of a secondary shooting during that evening involving what a retired marine identifies as automatic weapons fire leading to a panic at the Bellagio, significantly to the north along the strip: But most disturbing in some ways are aspects of the shooter's profile.
A wealthy heavy gambler for 20 years -- tens of thousands per day (with claims of up to a million), visible means of support . . . managing apartments that he partly owned . . . not reasonably fitting with such cash flows, live-in Philippina Australian citizen girlfriend met as a high stakes casino hostess, a pilot owning light aircraft, going here and there including the Middle East, mysterious millions.
The pattern suggests a drugs or low end arms dealer and intelligence asset. One, likely using casinos to launder funds and thus bring them into the "clean" economy.
Such a figure could easily become entangled in a web of multi-directional double-cross dealings and end up as the "patsy" that Lee Harvey Oswald announced himself to be seconds before being fatally shot by Jack Ruby. And that is consistent with ISIS, Antifa, the CIA, FBI and who knows what else being entangled in the case. ISIS has repeatedly claimed responsibility (with hints of a video) and there have been reports of Antifa literature. No wonder, given the way the major media houses have tossed away their objectivity and credibility, that so many are extremely suspicious. I again call attention to the straight vs spin challenge:
Let us realise that we live in an age of mass media manipulation and cynical deception. END
Where of course, if the Americans sneeze, we in the Caribbean proverbially catch 'flu with risks of pneumonia etc. So, we desperately need to understand more about the Limousine-burning, punch- a- 'nazi' "antifa" etc
. . . than what the US Democratic Party-dominated (and increasingly self-discredited) media will tell us in pursuit of their now ever more blatant spin agendas. Video: I of course have long since noted in this blog and elsewhere, that fascism and nazism are indeed to the "right" of bolsheviks such as Stalin et al. But, I have equally noted that they are actually far to the "left" of say a constitutional, rule- of- law democracy with respect for realities of markets that has a so-called mixed economy and encourages free enterprise while seeking to provide for the impoverished, marginalised and vulnerable. Further to all this, I should note that in my view the conventional left-right political spectrum is well past its sell-by date, especially when one moves beyond the extreme "left" of Marxism-dominated ideologies. Which, includes the cultural marxism (aka "critical theories"/"studies") that dominate so much of current academic thought and ideological movements. I have therefore suggested that a more useful frame of thought is to assess on a three-dimensional framework with a diagonal from utter autocracy to utter lawless, leaderless anarchy:
Beyond, let us not be naive about how we can be manipulated and induced into being part of a march of Ac 27 style, ruinous folly in a world that ever more stubbornly turns its back on our Creator and Redeemer:
So, let us heed warning-signs and turn back before it is too late:
